December 13, 2015

Defining true risk

By Stefan Dunatov, Chief Investment Officer, Coal Pension Trustees Investment Limited

The investment industry has two great failings: the inability to identify the right risks when considering investment objectives, and then measuring those risks the wrong way.

This short paper explores why the investment industry has become so focused on using volatility as a measure of risk, and the potentially dangerous implications that has for long- term investors in achieving their objectives. A long-term investor’s appetite or tolerance for risk should be a direct function of their individual objectives and should not be measured by a short-term metric like volatility. Forecasting returns, not risk, should sit at the heart of long-term investors’ asset allocation strategy.

  1. The emergence of volatility as a measure of risk

The increasing focus on forecasting risk, and the emergence of volatility as a popular measure of that risk, is a disappointing response by the investment industry to the recent difficulties it has faced.

Any investment manager would be excused for thinking the last 15 years have been difficult. Since the late 1990s, investors have been faced with an increase in apparent economic and investment uncertainty, especially in comparison to the preceding two decades.

The rising uncertainty stems from several sources, including: significant changes in investment and accounting regulations, not least the transition to marked-to-market pension liabilities under IFRS 13, which crystallises moves in asset prices more frequently on balance sheets; the impact on liabilities of a prolonged period of falling interest rates and therefore discount rates; and, perhaps most critically, the single largest market panic since the 1930s.

Download the full whitepaper (pdf , 146.45 KB)


February 14, 2020
Open Letter to Larry Fink - Welcome BlackRock
Economics has developed as a science, conveniently forgetting its roots in political philosophy. Unfortunately that ‘science’ is severely dated, and the functioning of the global capital markets has become separated from the real world. A simple thought experiment throws light on the theoretically correct strategies for a rational saver, but leaves us with unsatisfactory answers. Neglecting the societal context of our saving activity only serves to further isolate the capital markets. Instead, a self-perpetuating system requires investors to evolve from simple allocators of capital to its steward, with far broader responsibilities. Maximising holistic returns represents practical action of the responsibility by investors, and stretches far beyond creating wealth simply for its own sake.
February 28, 2018
Long-term investing in public equity markets
In 2015, fifteen Dutch CIOs of asset owners and asset managers wrote an article with the title: ‘Short-term profit or long-term value creation?’ A growing group of pension funds, asset managers, consultants and companies worldwide try to answer this question.
October 26, 2017
Making an impact by defining the right mix of ESG strategies
Whilst supranational institutions and NGOs have for too long been alone on the front lines of the battle against poverty, corruption, and resource depletion, both companies and the finance sector are now fully aware of the role they have to play in the transition to a more sustainable economy. So-called “megatrends” – demographics, globalisation, the environment, societal evolution – act as disruptive forces and offer growth potential for investors. The motivations of asset owners have evolved; they have become more elaborate, more complex and more meaningful, and now include topics that go beyond the unique consideration of achieving financial performance. Even if performance remains the primary objective, investors now want their portfolios to have an impact on both the environment and society, and want to measure the efficiency of this choice.